2002 MT 122
STATE OF MONTANA,v.
DAVID WAYNE NELSON
1. Whether the District Court abused its discretion when it restricted the scope of Nelson's cross-examination of his accomplice;
2. Whether the District Court's instruction to the jury on "fabrication by the defendant" prejudiced Nelson; and
3. Whether the District Court erred when it sentenced Nelson to the maximum sentence for Aggravated Kidnaping, even though the evidence established the victim had been released in a safe location without serious injury.
The District Court sentenced Nelson to twenty years with ten years suspended, even though both victims testified at trial that Shari was released in her home before Nelson and Fred left. Moreover, during sentencing, the District Court noted it was "mindful that [Nelson] terminated [his] involvement in these crimes before someone was seriously physically injured," and that neither victim was "seriously injured in a physical way."
The State concedes that under the facts of this case, the District Court erred in sentencing Nelson to more than the ten year maximum. We therefore remand this matter to the District Court for resentencing under § 45-5-303(2), MCA. Upon remand, the District Court may also address any inconsistency between the written and oral judgments as noted in ¶ 8 of this Opinion.
Affirmed in part, and remanded for resentencing.
Paralegal Mark Anthony Given has spent four years hand collecting every winning criminal case in the history of the Montana Supreme Court. A Montana Criminal Defense Attorney can find here in 15 minutes what would take days or even weeks to locate. This is a sample of the over 1,000 available winning cases, the rest will be available soon via pay site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(103)
-
▼
May
(47)
- Unable to pay fines
- Sentencing restriction nor "reasonably related" to...
- Bailey error, no restitution to dismissed counts
- Santobello error - breached plea agreement, specif...
- Blogroll Me!
- Ineffective Appellate Counsel
- Probable cause hearing, retroactive applcation of ...
- Santobello error, specific performance
- No restitution for dismissed count
- Insufficient evidence
- New Trial, Strike the jury
- we hold that the District Court exceeded its statu...
- we reverse that part of the sentence requiring tha...
- Ineffective Assistance of counsel winner
- insufficient evidence to support a conviction for
- No contempt for failing to pay fines
- did not receive a probable cause hearing within 36...
- Speedy Trial remand
- Ilegal sentence enhancement
- defective jury selection
- Post conviction appointment of counsel
- Parole eligibility
- Dangerous weapon enhancement double jeopardy
- Prosecutor's misconduct
- Ineffective counsel winner
- Ineffective assistance of counsel,
- Restitution winner
- Breached Plea Agreement
- Victim released unharmed
- Fines
- Illegal sentence
- Impartial juror
- No criminal charges for criminally insane
- Postponed restitution imposition improper
- Prior conviction enhancement infirm
- Boykin violation
- sex offender redesignation
- ex post facto winner
- Jail time credit, illegal sentence
- illegal sentence
- Ineffective assistance of counsel hearing
- street time credit, suspended sentence revoked
- Postconviction ineffectiveassistance of counsel hu...
- Motion to suppress, no exigent cirmcumstances
- Parole hearing, right to counsel
- Prior conviction unconstitutionally obtained
- Post conviction winner parole hearing
-
▼
May
(47)
No comments:
Post a Comment