2000 MT 100 check
STATE OF MONTANA,v.
CHARLES ROCKWOOD HORTON
1. Whether the District Court exceeded its statutory authority by ordering Horton to pay restitution for a dismissed count.
2. Whether the District Court abused its discretion by ordering Horton to pay restitution without first considering his financial resources and future ability to pay.
3. Whether the District Court erred when it failed to credit Horton with time served in
its written judgment after having allowed the credit in its oral pronouncement of sentence.
Because we hold in issue 1 that the District Court exceeded its statutory authority by ordering Horton to pay restitution for a dismissed count, it is unnecessary for us to address the question in issue 2 of Horton's ability to pay said restitution.
Because we hold in issue 1 that the District Court exceeded its statutory authority by ordering Horton to pay restitution for a dismissed count, it is unnecessary for us to address the question in issue 2 of Horton's ability to pay said restitution.
Paralegal Mark Anthony Given has spent four years hand collecting every winning criminal case in the history of the Montana Supreme Court. A Montana Criminal Defense Attorney can find here in 15 minutes what would take days or even weeks to locate. This is a sample of the over 1,000 available winning cases, the rest will be available soon via pay site.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Bailey error, no restitution to dismissed counts
Labels:
Bailey error,
criminal law,
criminal procedure,
Restitution
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(103)
-
▼
May
(47)
- Unable to pay fines
- Sentencing restriction nor "reasonably related" to...
- Bailey error, no restitution to dismissed counts
- Santobello error - breached plea agreement, specif...
- Blogroll Me!
- Ineffective Appellate Counsel
- Probable cause hearing, retroactive applcation of ...
- Santobello error, specific performance
- No restitution for dismissed count
- Insufficient evidence
- New Trial, Strike the jury
- we hold that the District Court exceeded its statu...
- we reverse that part of the sentence requiring tha...
- Ineffective Assistance of counsel winner
- insufficient evidence to support a conviction for
- No contempt for failing to pay fines
- did not receive a probable cause hearing within 36...
- Speedy Trial remand
- Ilegal sentence enhancement
- defective jury selection
- Post conviction appointment of counsel
- Parole eligibility
- Dangerous weapon enhancement double jeopardy
- Prosecutor's misconduct
- Ineffective counsel winner
- Ineffective assistance of counsel,
- Restitution winner
- Breached Plea Agreement
- Victim released unharmed
- Fines
- Illegal sentence
- Impartial juror
- No criminal charges for criminally insane
- Postponed restitution imposition improper
- Prior conviction enhancement infirm
- Boykin violation
- sex offender redesignation
- ex post facto winner
- Jail time credit, illegal sentence
- illegal sentence
- Ineffective assistance of counsel hearing
- street time credit, suspended sentence revoked
- Postconviction ineffectiveassistance of counsel hu...
- Motion to suppress, no exigent cirmcumstances
- Parole hearing, right to counsel
- Prior conviction unconstitutionally obtained
- Post conviction winner parole hearing
-
▼
May
(47)
No comments:
Post a Comment