91-435
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
1992
STATE OF MONTANA,
-vs-
MONA LORRAINE HAMILTON,
The issue is whether the official misconduct charges brought
against Hamilton were based on a continuing course of conduct so
that they were not barred by the one-year statute of limitation for
misdemeanors.
We hold that the charges against Hamilton are subject to the
general one-year statute of limitation for misdemeanor offenses.
Assuming the truth of the allegations in the information
against Hamilton and the affidavit upon which it is based, every
element of each offense in Counts IV, VII, and IX occurred more
than one year prior to the filing of the information. The order of
the District Court dismissing Counts IV, VII, and IX is therefore
affirmed
Paralegal Mark Anthony Given has spent four years hand collecting every winning criminal case in the history of the Montana Supreme Court. A Montana Criminal Defense Attorney can find here in 15 minutes what would take days or even weeks to locate. This is a sample of the over 1,000 available winning cases, the rest will be available soon via pay site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(103)
-
▼
October
(12)
- Jail time credit, 46-18-403(2)
- Santobello error, misdemeanor assualt and negligen...
- Insufficent evidence, liability insurance, Driving...
- Condition No. 10 also exceeds the District Court’s...
- 1 year time limit on misdemeanor prosecution 45-1-205
- 05-496IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA...
- official misconduct, statute of limitations
- 45-6-30 MCA, statute of limitations and theft
- No jurisdiction for offense on Indian Reservation
- Felony assualt insufficiency of evidence
- Entrapment
- Santobello error at revocation hearing
-
▼
October
(12)
No comments:
Post a Comment