2001 MT 210
STATE OF MONTANA,v.
CRAIG WILLIAM FRAZIER
1. Did the District Court have jurisdiction to set conditions for future probationary
sentencing and to change Frazier's sentences from consecutive to concurrent after
revocation of their suspension?
2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion by commenting on Frazier's criminal
propensities in the disposition order?
3. Did the District Court err by failing to inquire whether Frazier received effective
assistance of counsel during the revocation and resentencing proceedings?
Due to the dearth of evidence regarding the attorney client
relationship in the record, we cannot reach the substance of Frazier's claim of
ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal.
Remanded for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.
Paralegal Mark Anthony Given has spent four years hand collecting every winning criminal case in the history of the Montana Supreme Court. A Montana Criminal Defense Attorney can find here in 15 minutes what would take days or even weeks to locate. This is a sample of the over 1,000 available winning cases, the rest will be available soon via pay site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(103)
-
▼
June
(12)
- judgment suspending sentence on condition of resti...
- toll on equitable grounds the one-year time bar co...
- Illegal Sentence, restitution and recoupment canno...
- Sentencing error: $85 fee to the local community ...
- Alcohol Prohibition Sentencing error
- Santobello Error
- guilty pleas were entered without counsel and with...
- Peremptory challenge for cause error
- alcohol and gambling conditions were excessive
- No explanation for harsher sentence
- Ineffective assistance of counsel remand
- "extraordinary relief" habeas granted
-
▼
June
(12)
No comments:
Post a Comment