2003 MT 171
STATE OF MONTANA,v.
CHRISTOPHER JAMES RAY,
1. Was Ray denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial in the District Court?
2. Under § 45-6-204(2)(a), MCA, does the theft of a loaded gun qualify as “armed
with a weapon” for purposes of elevating a burglary charge to aggravated burglary?
Because mere possession of a loaded firearm in the course of a burglary qualifies Ray as armed with a weapon, one of Ray’s convictions for aggravated burglary will stand. The other conviction is reduced to burglary. Further, the District Court is directed to conduct a speedy trial analysis consistent with Bruce and this Opinion.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded for proceedings consistent with
this Opinion.
Paralegal Mark Anthony Given has spent four years hand collecting every winning criminal case in the history of the Montana Supreme Court. A Montana Criminal Defense Attorney can find here in 15 minutes what would take days or even weeks to locate. This is a sample of the over 1,000 available winning cases, the rest will be available soon via pay site.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(103)
-
▼
July
(11)
- DUI Independent blood test
- Speedy Trial analysis
- Restitution error
- Speedy Trial winner
- Retroactivity parole and probation revocation prob...
- ineffective assistance of counsel post conviction ...
- Alchohol, casino restriction error, and restitutio...
- District Court exceeded its authority, sex offende...
- Suspended sentence revocation error
- The District Court erred in denying Deserly’s moti...
- Withdraw guilty plea
-
▼
July
(11)
No comments:
Post a Comment