2007 MT 288
STATE OF MONTANA, v.
DAVID BULLMAN,
Did the District Court err when it failed to consider Bullman’s petition for re-designation based on the statutory language of § 46-23-509(4), MCA (2005)?
We conclude only that Bullman has the right to petition the courts for re-designation; the District Court must determine whether Bullman qualifies for re-designation.
Paralegal Mark Anthony Given has spent four years hand collecting every winning criminal case in the history of the Montana Supreme Court. A Montana Criminal Defense Attorney can find here in 15 minutes what would take days or even weeks to locate. This is a sample of the over 1,000 available winning cases, the rest will be available soon via pay site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(103)
-
▼
April
(8)
- Odor of alchohol not probable cause
- right to petition the courts for re-designation;
- ex post facto error
- Unable to pay fines but able to pay attorney fees?
- erred in failing to specify amount of restitution
- Illegal "Assesments" at sentencing
- Miranda violation
- Shackles in the Courtroom violates Due Process
-
▼
April
(8)
No comments:
Post a Comment